At the UPC, every pleading has its moment. The Mannheim Local Division just struck out a “summary” that went too far — reminding everyone that under Rule 32.3 RoP, anything beyond the allowed scope simply doesn’t count.
When does delivering parts already count as direct infringement? The Mannheim Local Division says: sooner than you think. Even unassembled kits — or a single component — may cross the line under Art. 25(a) UPCA.
Can managing directors be personally liable for patent infringement under the UPC? In Philips v. Belkin (CoA, 3 Oct 2025), the Court clarified when — and when not — such liability arises.
In this two-minute bite, we look at the Munich Local Division’s decision in BRITA SE v. Aquashield (UPC_CFI_248/2024) – a case that shows how far indirect infringement can reach under the UPC.
Even where a product itself is no longer protected, the system claim may still bite. And with remedies like warnings and contractual undertakings, the UPC demonstrates that indirect infringement remedies can be almost as powerful as a full injunction.
Watch the video to see how the Court’s reasoning plays out — in just two minutes.
Think you can add new prior art later at the UPC? Think again. In this episode, we break down a ruling that makes one thing clear: if your prior art was already in the search results—no matter how far down—you’re out of luck.
