No fluff. No long podcasts. Just sharp, actionable insights on the latest UPC decisions — in 2 minutes.
In our UPC video series, we break down the latest UPC decisions and developments into clear takeaways. Brief, to the point, and always focused on what matters most for patent practitioners – every second Thursday, in just 2 minutes.
Two recent orders from the UPC Court of Appeal confirm an important procedural point: appeal proceedings are designed to have a very limited written phase.
A short but important clarification from Paris.
In Valeo v Bosch, order of 17 February 2026, the Local Division Paris interpreted Article 33.1(b) UPCA – specifically the requirement that, in multi-defendant cases, “the action relates to the same alleged infringement”.
In a follow-up order of 30 January 2026, the Mannheim Local Division confirmed substantial penalty payments for continued non-compliance with recall, destruction and information obligations. But the real interest lies elsewhere.
You can follow UPC Video Bites on all major short-form platforms:
YouTube Instagram TikTok LinkedIn
One format. Multiple platforms. Always under 120 seconds.
Stay one step ahead in UPC litigation — subscribe to our newsletter.
