No fluff. No long podcasts. Just sharp, actionable insights on the latest UPC decisions — in 2 minutes.
In our UPC video series, we break down the latest UPC decisions and developments into clear takeaways. Brief, to the point, and always focused on what matters most for patent practitioners – every Friday, in just 2 minutes.
In a judgment of 23 October 2025, the Milan branch of the Central Division sent a very clear message to revocation claimants: too many attacks can be a problem in themselves.
In a recent decision of 20 October 2025, the Paris seat of the Central Division took a notable step away from the EPO’s traditional problem–solution approach.
The case, Meril Life Sciences v. Edwards Lifesciences, concerned heart valves and became a showcase for what the Paris Central Division called a holistic inventive-step assessment.
How far does a “purpose” in a patent claim really go?
In BRITA SE v. Aquashield (UPC_CFI_248/2024), the Munich Local Division clarified that purpose-limited device claims are confined to objective suitability, not subjective intent.
You can follow UPC Video Bites on all major short-form platforms:
YouTube Instagram TikTok LinkedIn
One format. Multiple platforms. Always under 120 seconds.
Stay one step ahead in UPC litigation — subscribe to our newsletter.
